Goldfinger (1964) Review

There is a reason that Goldfinger is so fondly remembered; it is the epitome of a Bond movie. Goldfinger is the blueprint that many other Bond movie will follow and rightly so. It has all the key ingredients that From Russia with Love was missing but movies like Goldeneye or even Skyfall will continue to use almost 50 years later.

The first and most obvious of these differences is the villain. Gert Frobe’s Goldfinger is a fantastic villain and in the classic style of an exaggerated, criminal mastermind with an ambitiously crazy plan. He is both enigmatic and scary in equal measure and more than a match for our hero. Having a decent villain means that we get some decent deaths and dastardly plans too. Within the first act we have a woman killed by gold-paint suffocation and then later we get the laser scene which has become classic within both the Bond franchise and movie scenes in general – and rightfully so.

Goldfinger is a very good Bond villain

It isn’t just a few key scenes that make this a classic. Goldfinger sees the introduction of the now distinctive Aston Martin and in this movie, equipped with the now famous ejector seat and bullet-proof screen. It is only the third movie in the franchise but timeless and key moments are already being carved through.

It is also arguably Sean Connery’s best turn as Bond. He is more comfortable here than he will be in any other of the movies. He is both action hero and gentleman spy. He gets tortured, washed-through pipes and even outwitted by this movies Bond girl. At no point does it look like Connery is having anything less than a whole lot of fun with the role and it would be near impossible for anyone to repeat the way he plays it in this movie.

Pussy Galore is a Bond girl who matches the super-spy

The final ingredient for success? A great and effective Bond girl. A Bond girl should never just be a pretty lady for Bond to rescue or take to bed. That is the worse use for a Bond girl you can have and even shone like a negative beacon back in the 60s. Honor Blackman is fantastic as the sexy, adventurous and very able Pussy Galore. Ridiculous name aside, she is a match for Bond and doesn’t just succumb easily in the first instance. It makes for a much more interesting movie and adds to the films overall success.

Goldfinger also benefits from a clear, straight-forward story that leads well to a worthwhile climax. It doesn’t just peter out pathetically but actually develops into a final act with real action. The fight between Bond and Oddjob in the bank vault, while a bomb ticks down to destruction, is executed brilliantly and the final outcome of the scene is a great mix of tension and humour.

Oddjob is what a henchman is all about

It isn’t the perfect Bond film. There are some low, quite slow points in the middle that seem to plague early Bond but the classic material that is developed in this movie more than makes up for it.

Overall, Goldfinger is the blueprint for how to deliver a classic Bond movie. Connery is at his best as the super-spy but is matched by the brilliant villain. Add to this Honor Blackman’s unfortunately named Bond girl and some now distinctive and memorable scenes and you have a Bond movie that more than matches some of the more recent outings for the hero.

Rating – 4.5

(1 – Awful, 2 – Average, 3 – Good, 4 – Great, 5! – Must See)

An iconic Bond movie

6 thoughts on “Goldfinger (1964) Review

  1. I’ve been watching the Sean Connery Bond films this year, and it is interesting how the Austin Powers trilogy spoofs so many elements, e.g., Oddjob becomes Random Task, Goldfinger becomes Goldmember. In the Goldfinger novel, Pussy Galore is a lesbian, so that is why she tells Bond that she is “immune” to his charms. Bond’s response is politically incorrect today. He successfully seduces her. In the 1960s, not even a lesbian can resist James Bond. I wrote a short essay on the film called “The Absurd Nature of Greed.” Here is the link if you would like to read it:

    1. There are so many moments in those early movies where Bond does things we wouldn’t accept today. The amount of times he practically forces himself on the women he is “seducing.”

      Not to mention the more racist elements that occur in movies like You Only Live Twice.

      I’ll definitely give the essay a look. Thanks for stopping by.

  2. After watching every single Bond film in preparation for Skyfall, Goldfinger remained my favourite out of the series.As I wrote in my review, the Bond cocktail that was established in the first two films has well and truly been perfected: a killer theme tune, plenty of action, a scheming villain and a beautiful Bond girl.

    Auric Goldfinger is a brilliant villain and he has the pleasure of saying arguably one of the best lines of all time: “No, Mr Bond, I expect you to die!”

    1. You’re right. It also becomes much more noticeable after this point when they stray from that formula. There is a reason that certain Bond traits began to stick and that is because Goldfinger was such a good film. Thanks for stopping by.

You've heard my opinion, let me know what you think...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s