X-Men (2000) Re-View

It’s strange to go all the way back to the very beginning of the X-Men franchise when so much has happened since. It is worth going back to see how much has changed, evolved and improved since the 2000 movie that arguably started the superhero “Movie Golden Age” we are going through now.

My last review focused mostly on the great casting and poor villains and how under-whelming the whole experience seemed after we have seen so many, amazing superhero movies since. What is apparent in X-Men though is the template for the more successful superhero movies.

First of all, it takes itself seriously. This always had to be the case after the disaster of Batman and Robin. It also had to be the case because of the source material. This is a movie about a man with extendable claws, a man who fires lasers from his eyes and a villain who’s power seems to be a huge tongue! Play this for laughs and you kill the series from the beginning. Play it as a serious, straight action movie; you get the success that followed.

The film had to take itself seriously considering the source material

You can also see the beginning of the stand-out stars of the series. Patrick Stewart’s Professor X and Ian McKellen’s Magneto were always going to command the movie and they are perfectly cast. The biggest success has of course been Hugh Jackman as Wolverine and it is no surprise that he has played the character a whopping 7 times!

The bigger surprise is how integral to the future films Mystique would become. This is the first issue with a franchise as big and as long as X-Men. Mystique and a past relationship with Professor X is a key part of both First Class and Days of Future Past but as the events of this movie is supposed to be after those two, it is jarring that she is so under-played and feels like a bit-part player. (The same could also be said Sabretooth compared to the Liev Schreiber version from Wolverine’s Origin movie). This is of course the biggest issue with a vast, multi-film franchise and something that Marvel will have to start thinking about with their universe too.

The film does suffer from being part of a bigger franchise, where characters have changed or become more important since

Mystique is an example of how good the effects are though. Her changing skin, Cyclops lasers and Wolverine’s claws are all imagined brilliantly considering this movie is 14 years old. It still holds up as a credible superhero movie but it does feel very simplistic.

Superhero films have evolved. Nolan’s trilogy has demonstrated that superhero movies can be epic. Avengers has shown that a multi-cast movie can be successful and other movies in the genre have moved away from the simplistic, good guys vs bad guys, three act, straight-forward formula. This is where going back to a movie like X-Men can demonstrate how much we’ve moved on but also shows the weaknesses and how ordinary this movie is.

Overall, X-Men deserves the credit (or blame) as the movie that started it all. It also demonstrates the successful template that other superhero movies will steal, adapt and improve on. This means that X-Men is a credible, if somewhat ordinary superhero movie that suffers from its age. It also suffers from being slighty odd considering how much has changed in the series now.

Rating – 3

1 – Awful, 2 – Average, 3 – Good, 4 – Great, 5! – Must See)

Read the original review here.

What you do get is the template for what makes a successful superhero movie

6 thoughts on “X-Men (2000) Re-View

  1. Yeah, the taking itself seriously part was key, you are right. As for the credit or blame question, it has to be more credit. I mean sure, there are a lot of comic book movies now and not all are great. But there will always be poor and disappointing movies made, no matter what the current trend. And considering the genre has given us some really great and some very fun movies as well, its definitely gotta be credit.

  2. I’ve always considered Blade the kick-off to this Golden Age of comic book movies. True, he was never a superhero like the X-Men, but after a D- hero could have some box office success, it definitely showed there was a market for them if the filmmakers didn’t make them to be a punchline.

    1. I forget about Blade. Blade opened the door, I think X-Men showed that the audience were there properly. You could even argue that Spiderman demonstrated that serious money could be made.

      1. Definitely. Blade and X-Men paved the way, but until Spider-Man broke box office records, Hollywood still didn’t treat superhero movies like the goldmine they do now.

You've heard my opinion, let me know what you think...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s